Wednesday, April 1, 2009

Father And Son Masterbate

Mosque: Jankovic has rejected the initiative Jarc [slo]


Zoran Janković Mayor of Ljubljana has again rejected the initiative of Councilor Mihela JARC broken down by the referendum on the mosque.


According to the mayor of the initiative does not meet the formal requirements, that is inconsistent with the status, legislation and the Administrative Court ruling. Jankovic said that after the decision of the Administrative Court, who had once backed a proposal to reconsider the by the mayor, was Jarcowi clearly stated what needs to be improved. "Mr. Jarc was able to improve. The reasons I do not know. Perhaps he can not, and may not want to improve, "said Jankovic and added that the councilman might once again ask the Administrative Court.
Mayor stressed that, when relied upon by the JARC project initiative of the question ("Do you agree [agrees with you] from the City Council adopted a decree" ), Jankovic does not understand, "what is in that case the role of City Council and its judgments. "

Jarc already provides for establishment of a court case.

decision has not yet decided, but it allows for this possibility.

" If the City Council vote and decide on matters which, according to the laws, the Declaration and the Constitution are inalienable human rights, why the townspeople, who are themselves members of the city mandated the Council to exercise power, can not vote in his own name Niu," explained Jarc .
How else said, the problem does not make the temple itself, as an object, but the minaret, science center, shopping center, sports hall and 30 dwellings.

Translation from rtvslo.si

a reminder, the City Council with the mayor for the construction of a mosque (with the complex religious and cultural). Passed the relevant law, which accurately identifies the site and contains a description of allowable development, but there is nothing about the choice of architectural style. Jarcowi do not like the first mosque height (over 40m) and the incorporation or its absence in the area.






0 comments:

Post a Comment